Comments on: “I hope it will be done in the next two or three hours”

By: Harry's Tax Accountant

Harry's Tax Accountant — Wed, 03 Feb 2010 13:46:15 +0000

Harry can’t resist playing around in the transfer market. It’s never a case of being patient and waiting for the right guy with him – if somebody’s available he has to give it a go. Kaboul and Gudjohnsen are great disappointments being distinctly lacking if measured in terms of the Top 4. The Pav situation is just a running sore which should have been sorted by him leaving, but of course by playing brinkmanship with Birmingham on the price the deal fell through. I don’t believe the smokescreen about Keane’s loan either. It was done to save money from his wages, like the other loans, all brought about by the failure to sell Pav.

By: Bingy

Bingy — Tue, 02 Feb 2010 01:57:25 +0000

I am NOT sure if Harry has ‘what it takes’ to further improve our squad. He has his head ‘FIRMLY’ stuck up his ass by trying to improve the English WC strike force….to the detriment of OUR club! Lanky Crouch and aimless/selfish Defoe….The way to get Europa League, Harry….which, in itself, has been shown to be a ‘bridge too far’? FORGET dreams of WC and concentrate on your JOB (if you can actually remember what it is!) COYS!

By: koko61

koko61 — Mon, 01 Feb 2010 21:22:06 +0000

NOW TIME TO START PLAYING PAV,Harry .We missed to many chances at BRUM, if PAV was playing we would have beaten them with ease.

By: STEVE

STEVE — Mon, 01 Feb 2010 18:10:27 +0000

Bonkers to let Keane go on loan, but they cannot affload Pav for the right price unless they give him away so he stays till the summer. I think the grand plan to offload him has seriously backfired and Harry has made a bloopper bringing in Gudjohnsen. I would have rather kept to the 4 we had even if he was unhappy. Keane for some reason has not been the same player since the Xmas party incident so perhaps there is a problem between him and Redknapp.

By: JOHN ADAM

JOHN ADAM — Mon, 01 Feb 2010 17:58:40 +0000

We would be giving ammunition to Birmingham if we were to sell them Pavlyuchenko. Spurs should not sell him as he has a lot to offer to the team if we were to make greater use of him.

By: SpursMalaysia

SpursMalaysia — Mon, 01 Feb 2010 14:49:10 +0000

Didn’t Harry say that Pav doesn’t want to go to Birmingham? Harry must be in a different world from his players. Either that or he doesn’t give rat’s ass what they think as long as he gets his way.

By: natrug

natrug — Mon, 01 Feb 2010 14:17:36 +0000

despite the” he’s going nowhere” & the “he is a world class striker” it is clear to everyone that arry dose,t rate pav, which is a crying shame when you consider the opportunities he has given he’s favored ones, even i disagree with this move but i have come to the conclusion that this maybe the best deal for all concerned,what a pity because i think he is probaly the best finisher we have at the club, i will never forget the goals he scored especially against the scoucers.

By: jacko

jacko — Mon, 01 Feb 2010 14:09:09 +0000

won’t happen unless spurs get right money .i think he’ll still be here come tomorrow loan out keane instead

By: Etrilad

Etrilad — Mon, 01 Feb 2010 14:01:42 +0000

I hope not, Birmingham aren’t too far behind us and that’s without a goalscorer. Levy needs his head checked if he sells to another top 10 prem team.

By: Rooster

Rooster — Mon, 01 Feb 2010 13:44:40 +0000

Spurs NEED to keep Pavlyuchenko – he is really good. If Spurs cannot stop him going, then he must NOT be allowed to play for another Premiership club. Abroad? Fine.