MF looks back at Reading 1-3 Spurs


An ultimately straightforward win against an unexpectedly feeble and limp Reading. Two fine finishes from Defoe were separated by a scuffed one from Bale, all of which came long before the home team scraped a consolation in the dying minutes. (Four league games now and a late goal conceded in each.)  Those are the bare facts and in many ways it was such a one-sided and uneventful game that it’s hard to think of much more to add. Reading’s performance makes you wonder why Chelsea had so many problems with them a few weeks ago.

We were on top from the off and should’ve put the game well beyond the proverbial doubt before half time. Sigurdsson and Defoe both squandered chances or were desperately foiled as the Reading back line, led by the magnificently named Gorkss, woefully and inadequately failed to deal with anything we threw at them whether it be Lennon or Walker attempting to get to the bye-line or long balls from Vertonghen or Naughton at the back. The latter pair seemed to be allowed as much time as they wanted to pick out a man or involve Sandro or Dembélé. The Royals only threat came from set pieces all of which were dealt with comfortably, though we looked lucky to escape a penalty shout for handball with the score at 0-0 when Walker inadvertently pawed a cross away when under pressure.

Reading improved in the second period and with the score still only 1-0, you could see an equaliser in your mind’s eye as we allowed them more possession but thankfully the second and third goals came and calmed those particular fears

Sigurdsson’s position in the set-up we played on Sunday is key. His job is to find space and quickly use the ball to bring others into play, a role he performed with only limited success I’d say. An understanding between him and the others is still developing but he needs to take a lot more care with his distribution. The selection of Naughton rather than move Vertonghen across to cover the missing BAE was presumably because Villas-Boas wants the partnership between Gallas and the Belgian to build. Naughton added something going forward definitely but he dived into challenges unnecessarily too often thus putting us under pressure from free-kicks. Dembélé played deep and was often behind Sandro in the centre. He makes dribbling past players look easy; it all took place too far from goal for him to be at his most effective though. Defoe, Lennon, Walker and the two in the centre of midfield were excellent.

Call it confidence or stubbornness but AVB stuck to his selection strategy and it came good.  The press will be off his back for a few days until the opportunity to make up a ‘Hugo/Ade/Dawson in showdown talks’ piece arises. A switch of focus next as Lazio come to town on Thursday evening. Team selection will be interesting, personally I hope the manager takes the competition a lot more seriously than Harry did.


Have something to tell us about this article?


  1. Now that BAE is out for four weeks, I'm hoping Bale will be switched to left back and Townsend would play on left wing. Townsend is like a left-sided Lennon, very quick and skilful. He beats a lot of players and loves to run at people. With this set-up, he'll be able to draw opposing players to him and create ample space for Bale to run into and work his magic, just like what we have with the Lennon-Walker combination on the right. Right now, Bale is being crowded out game after game, and becomes totally ineffective whenever he tries his luck on the right.

    The other change I'd really like to see is the team not taking the foot off the pedal when leading. It always ends up with us giving away a goal or more absolutely needlessly. Why can't we maintain the same attacking mind-set for 90 min like what we did against Wigan some seasons back that saw us win 9-1? Defoe is always dying to score. Let him score as many as possible. Bring on Huddlestone and we start to become really lazy and aimless. Yesterday's match gives ample evidence of that. This will cause us points if we are not careful.

    • Some interesting ideas, but I have to disagee with your analysis about bringing Huddlestone on. As I understand and saw it, bringing Huddlestone on is a move to gain more control over the game. He will keep possession and he has biggest range and most accurate passing in our team, even pre-depatures of Modric and VDV. He can also be very direct. He is brought on to suit the changed dynamic of the game by our taking of the lead. Also, contrary to a superficial analysis, it is not a negative move, as Dembele (who originally signed for Fulham as a striker, before dropping progressively deeper) moves further up-field.

      In addition, it is lovely to see Huddlestone back: his feint to lose two Reading players from a throw in was sublime; and the way he smashed the ball out to the right-handside at one point was classic BigTom suff.

    • Also, how strong did our bench look! Can't wait until Thursday!

      Smith, Dawson, Caulker, Naughton
      Falque?, Livermore, Demsey, Huddlestone, Townsend

      Apart from the fact that they've never played together, not shabby at all.

    • Very good analysis. We will have to see what Redknapp does with VDV. But to me it seems like a panic buy. Redknapp has alayws favored two strikers with 2 wide men delivering crosses into the box. Will be interesting to see especially as Modric’s enforced absence was the reason for Bale’s emergence as a winger. With both VDV and Modric available it will be interesting to see how he manages to cram them into his team


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.